Home | home Back To Idle Prattle
Or What | 911Legal | ELLEN MARIANI OF PENNSYLVANIA
911Legal
Widow's Bush 911 Treason Suit
Vanishes In Blink Of Media Eye
by W. David Kubiak
"The decision 'not to do the story'
appears to be multiplying all over the nation."
Fred Powledge, ACLU
"Whoever said `no news is good news,'
was badly misinformed."
Dan Rather
Think you're already amazed, alarmed or appalled enough by the state of US journalism today? Chew on this a while and think again.
Grieving New Hampshire widow who lost her man on 9/11 refuses the government's million dollar
hush money payoff, studies the facts of the day for nearly two years, and comes to believe the White House "intentionally allowed 9/11 to happen" to launch a so-called "War on Terrorism" for personal and political gain.
She retains a prominent lawyer, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction under both Democrats and Republicans and was once a strong candidate for the governor's seat.
The attorney files a 62-page complaint in federal district court
(including 40 pages of prima facie evidence) charging that "President Bush and officials including, but not limited to Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft and Tenet":
1.) had adequate foreknowledge of 911 yet failed to warn the county or attempt to prevent it;
2.) have since been covering up the truth of that day;
3.) have therefore abetted the murder of plaintiff's husband and violated the Constitution and multiple laws of the United States; and
4.) are thus being sued under the Civil RICO (Racketeering, Influence, and Corrupt Organization) Act for malfeasant conspiracy, obstruction of justice and wrongful death.
The suit text goes on to document the detailed forewarnings from foreign governments and FBI agents; the unprecedented delinquency of our air defense; the inexplicable half hour dawdle of our Commander in Chief at a primary school after hearing the nation was under deadly attack; the incessant invocation of national security and executive privilege to suppress the facts; and the obstruction of all subsequent efforts to investigate the disaster. It concludes that "compelling evidence will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena power, and testimony
[that] Defendants failed to act and prevent 9/11 knowing the attacks would lead to??| an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and politically."
Press releases detailing these explosive allegations are sent out to 3000 journalists in the print and broadcast media, and a press conference to announce the filing is held in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on November 26th (commemorating the end of the first futile year of the independent National 9/11 Commission).
Imagine the world-churning implications of these charges. Imagine the furor if just one was proved true. Imagine the courage of this bribe-shunning widow and an eminent attorney with
his rep on the line. Then imagine a press conference to which nobody came.
(Well, more precisely, imagine a press conference at which only FOX News appears, tapes for 40 minutes, and never airs an inch.)
Now imagine the air time, column inches and talk show hysteria that same night devoted to the legal hassles of Michael, Kobe, and Scott Peterson, and divide that by the attention paid to our little case of mass murder, war profiteering and treason. (OK, this is really a trick question because no number divided by zero yields any answers whatsoever, which evidently in this case is the result preferred.)
When you present documented charges of official treachery behind the greatest national security disaster in modern history and the press doesn't show, doesn't listen, doesn't write - just what in fact is really being communicated? That despite all the deaths, lies, wars, and bizarre official actions that flowed from 9/11 there's actually nothing there to be investigated at all? That addressing desperate victim families' still unanswered cries for truth is not a legitimate journalistic concern? That news will now be what the corporate media say it will be, so drink
your infotainment Kool-Aid and kindly shut up?
(While the 9/11 blackout is the most flagrant sign of current media dysfunction, it hardly stands alone. Where, for example, was our free and fearless press when Pentagon powerbroker Richard Perle confessed to a London audience last month that yes indeed, our war on Iraq was illegal as hell? He calmly explained that "in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing??| [it] would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone, and this would have been morally unacceptable."
(Guardian/UK, 11/20/03) And what news have we seen of the thousands of Depleted Uranium deaths and birth defects now desolating Afghanis, Iraqis and our own Gulf War troops? And whose looking into the $1.2 trillion the Pentagon admits is "missing" or the half trillion in laundered funds now propping up our banks? And how many times have you seen it reported that unbid Iraq contracts have pushed the worth of VP Cheney's 433,333 Halliburton stock options to $26 million plus? But to return to 9/11, the funny business has just begun. If you thought press performance after JFK's death was a cynical farce, you ain't seen nothing yet.)
A few years back Harold Evans of the London Sunday Times, observed that the challenge facing American newspapers "is not to stay in business -- it is to stay in journalism.'' As corporations' authoritarian, profit-driven consciousness comes to dominate both media and governance, you can expect a lot more serial celebrity scandals and even less news on the way things work or anything that really counts.
There is a clear method and message in this obscurantist madness. All this media consolidation and tightening control is strategically aligned with deregulation, privatization, social program-gutting deficits and free trade regimes. They are all convergent tactics to enforce corporations' full spectrum dominance over democratic humankind. If your progressive or
conservative instincts bid you to arise against this coup, standing with our 9/11 widow is a good place to start. Her name is Ellen Mariani, her lawyer is Phillip Berg and their complaint is now online at
Read it and weep, wail, or whack out a dozen letters to the editors around your town, but for god's sake make some noise. When 9/11 bombshells fall silent in the corporate media's forest
it's up to us to make them resound.
W. David Kubiak is director of Big Medicine, a research and education institute studying the corporate takeover of our country, culture and consciousness.
I, Mark R. Elsis, wrote the 911Timeline.net and StandDown.net for historical and legal reasons.
Let us get behind this Federal Lawsuit brought by Ellen Mariani, for her husband Louis Neil Mariani, and the other 3055 people who were murdered on 911.
Federal Lawsuit: Ellen Mariani (911 Widow) vs. Bush
The "Summary of Facts" will set the foundation to support Plaintiff Counts as set forth herein. However, a complete highly researched timelines of "911" by American Citizen Mark R. Elsis
( http://911Timeline.net and http://StandDown.net ) who has agreed to testify to his research on behalf of Plaintiff, and believed to be one of the "most comprehensive minute by minute accounts of the events of "911".
#2
View article without comments
The 911 scam reveals more proof
by Minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger • Monday August 19, 2002 at 08:25 PM
excele1@direct.ca 1-780-9673915 C/o Church of Ecumenical Redemption, Heatherdown
ecclesia, near Onoway, Alberta, Canada, no code non commercial
More proof that bush knew
FriendsOfLiberty.com
Submitted by Anonymous 8-17-02
8-19-2
The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous flight capability, they are the only two Boeing commuter aircraft capable of fully autonomous flight. They can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land, completely without a pilot at the controls.
They are intelligent planes, and have software limits pre set so that pilot error cannot cause passenger injury. Though they are physically capable of high g maneuvers, the software in their flight control systems prevents high g maneuvers from being performed via the cockpit controls. They are limited to approximately 1.5 g's, I repeat, one and one half g's. This is so that a pilot mistake cannot end up breaking grandma's neck.
No matter what the pilot wants, he cannot override this feature.
The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical limits, military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between five and seven g's in its final turn. The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the WTC.
There is only one way this can happen. As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a feature that is standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it. The purpose for this is if there is a problem with the pilots, Norad can fly the planes to safe destinations via remote. Only in this flight mode can those craft exceed their software limits and perform to their actual physical limits because a pre existing emergency situation is assumed if this mode of flight is used.
Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is totally and completely impossible for
those planes to have been flown in such a manner from the cockpit. Those are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software knows it.
Another piece of critical evidence: the voice recorders came up blank.
The flight recorders that were recovered had tape that was undamaged inside, but it was blank. There is only one way this can happen on a 757 or 767. When the aircraft are commandeered via remote control, the microphones that go to the cockpit voice recorder are re routed to the people doing the remote controlling, so that the recording of what happened in the cockpit gets made in a presumably safer place. But due to a glitch in the system on a 757/767, rather than shutting off when the mic is redirected the voice recorder keeps running. The voice recorders use what is called a continuous loop tape, which automatically re passes itself past the erase and record heads once every half hour, so after a half hour of running with the microphones redirected, the tape will be blank. Just like the recovered tapes were. Yet more proof that no pilot flew those planes in the last half hour.
Eight of the hijackers who were on those planes called up complaining that they were still alive. I'd bet you never heard about our foreign minister flying to Morocco and issuing an official apology to the accused, did you? No, terrorists did not fly those planes, plastic knives and box cutters were in fact too ridiculous to be true. Any of the remaining accused have certainly been sought out and killed by now.
Our information IS controlled The cell phone calls from the aircraft could not have happened. I am a National Security Agency trained Electronic Warfare specialist, and am qualified to say this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare Intercept Strategic Signal Processing/Storage Systems Specialist, a highly skilled MOS which requires advanced knowledge of many communications methods and circuits to the most minute level. I am officially qualified to place severe doubt that ordinary cell phone calls were ever made from the aircraft.
It was impossible for that to have happened, especially in a rural area for a number of reasons.
When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your
cell phone will not be able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who
your provider is, 3. Tell the tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4. Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes out of a five watt range. This procedure, called an electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for a cell
phone to complete upon initial power up in a roaming area because neither the cell
phone or cell transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it uses when it is
turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the range of a cell phone's five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur. Though it is sometimes
possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under the situation that was claimed the calls were impossible. The calls from the airplane were faked, no if's or buts.
I hope I made sense, if you have questions I will respond if possible. If I do not respond, please research this out yourself, search the boeing site, search the DARPA site,search were you have not searched before. Some of the information is classified and leaked by individuals, and it is also being scoured from the net. I have all of the
original documents on my computer to safeguard against this.
Please do not ignore this, because only Norad has the flight codes for those aircraft, we did 911 to ourselves. Hitler had the Reichstag, we have 911. If 911 proves to not be
enough to make the US citizenry set aside its rights for safety, the people who did 911 most certainly have access to nuclear material. 911 must be exposed for what it was
before that material is used.
add your comments
Rubbish
by CSB • Thursday August 22, 2002 at 01:54 PM
TheSaintCSB@aol.com
What this stated in that article, " 9-11 planes exceeded software performance limits" or "Two 911 Jetliners EXCEEDED
Their Software Barriers" from Friends of Liberty, is incorrect regarding the 757's and 767's (and most of the rest of it).
The Boeing 757 and 767, as used in the hijackings, aren't fly-by-wire aircraft, they're flight control systems are hydraulic, not computerised, all 757's and 767's have are onboard computerised warning systems to suggest actions to the pilot, a voice saying "PULL UP! PULL UP!" and alarms when diving are too low etc.
I'd ask people to look into the Boeing 757 that crashed into a mountain ridge while trying to land at Cali, Colombia, in 1995, the 757's ground-warning system told the pilot to pull up, as he did, but the pilot did not retract the speed brakes as they climbed.
The only Boeing that is fly-by-wire with build in computerised pilot assistance/override is the 777. On the 777 though the pilot has the ultimate say, pilots in general don't like being flown by computers, they can override the onboard computers and their built-in soft limits i.e. maximum g, pitch, roll etc on the 777. The only airliners that have flight control computers that the pilot can't override are Airbus A320's and newer Airbus models - the most controversial airliners going among pilots.
As for the rest of it I can't even be bothered.
In my opinion it's disinformation presented to discredit (and confuse) those that are seeking for answers regarding 9/11.
Rense.com have updated their posting of it:
Flight Evaluation: Boeing 767-400ER
Air Line Pilot, February 2001, p. 22
By Capt. Terry L. Lutz (Northwest), Director, Aircraft Development and Evaluation
Programs, ALPA Aircraft Design and Operation Group
"With the absence of the "soft protections" incorporated in the B-777, the B-767-400ER
feels more "like an airplane."...."
---------------------
Unlike Airbus, Boeing lets aviator override fly-by-wire technology
Monday, March 20, 2000
By JAMES WALLACE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
add your comments
Belanger, you been smokin' that evil weed again
by friend of the weed • Thursday August 22, 2002 at 10:35 PM
Edmonton
Sigh!!!!
I favour legalization of pot, but with some of the weird ideas this guy
gets with his historical rights and this strange church of his, I begin
to think that maybe, just maybe, his
pot is triggering some unusual activities in his synapses.
Enough of these conspiracies already.
add your comments
student
by carla • Wednesday July 30, 2003 at 11:28 AM
can't admit the truth? if these ideas were pointing to the hijackers -
which is the actual conspiracy - most people would automatically be accept it. use your mind and think
about it . . . it's not only possible, it's highly likely.
add your comments
chrondon
by John Doe • Wednesday September 10, 2003 at 06:32 AM
chrondon69@911.com
how can you people be so naieve?
can you tell Bush and his devil have done this, FACE the truth and dont believe the laws.
some of you peoploe are so fucking stupid!
i bet you support the troops and bought some flags and duck tape.
get a clue before your dead!
add your comments
Killer Robot Jetplanes
by John Lee • Thursday November 06, 2003 at 04:18 PM
knoxpulse@yahoo.com Knoxville TN
http://geocities.com/sept911treason
"There are no innocent civilians..., so it doesn't bother me so much to be killing innocent bystanders."
—General Curtis E. LeMay, US Air Force Chief of Staff (1961 - 1965), Vice Presidential running mate of George Wallace (attempted assassination resulting in paraplegia),
National Journal, 11/26/94
US Air Force Museum
Unpiloted Vehicles Index
Wright Patterson Air Force Base
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/ind/uvind.htm
"We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could
be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining
members of the non-existant crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation. We could develop a Communist Cuba terror
campaign in the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States.
We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cubans in the United States even to the extent of wounding
in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few bombs in carefully chosen spots. The arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating
cuban involvement. Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping, and destruction of US
military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the
transport were to announce that fact. Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which would
demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United States. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and
numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be
subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. Take
off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rondevous. From the rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to
minimum altitude and go directly to an auxiliary airfield at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its
original status. Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan. The drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency "MAY DAY"
message stating it is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will
allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident. It is possible to create an incident that will make it
appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly
Tail-end Charlie. While near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then fly at extremely low
altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who performed
the mission under an alias would resume his proper identity. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. A submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts,
parachute, etc. The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found. It is
understood that the Department of State is also preparing suggested courses of action to develope justification for US military intervention in Cuba."
—General L. L. Limnitzer, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
TOP SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING NOFORN
The Joint Chiefs of Staff
Pentagon, Washington DC
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense
Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)
JCS to Secretary of War Robert McNamara
March 13, 1962
(Operation NORTHWOODS Declassified in 2000 - pdf images of actual documents, 15 pages, 750kb)
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
"The Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was conceived at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief of the Construction Division of the
Office of the Quartermaster General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to provide a temporary solution to the War Department's critical shortage of
space.The groundbreaking ceremony took place on September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the
groundbreaking. Construction began 11 September 1941."
—The Pentagon: Headquarters for US Department of Defense, Facts & Figures, updated: 25-Oct-2000
http://www.dmdc.osd.mil
22 November 2001 - "Aerospace giant Boeing has decided that it needs to give serious thought to cutting pilots out of the cockpit. The company has established a new
organisation dedicated to efforts in the expanding 'unmanned systems' market and aimed at fast-tracking the development of pilotless aircraft. At one time, the US military
said it had no desire to allow unmanned aircraft to carry lethal payloads. However, following tests last year with Predator UAV's firing Hellfire anti-tank missiles, and the
subsequent deployment and success of the pairing in killing tanks in Afghanistan, the Pentagon has warmed rapidly to the idea. The Boeing group will look at the feasibility
of cheap, expendable UAV's that could be sent on suicidal missions. Based in St.Louis, the new Unmanned Systems group will be headed up by Mike Heinz and report to
both Jerry Daniels, president and chief executive officer of Boeing Military Aircraft and Missile Systems, and George Muellner, president, Boeing Phantom Works, the
company's advanced research-and-development unit. 'Unmanned systems are the future of aerospace,' Daniels said."
http://www.beyond2000.com/news/Nov_01/story_1302.html
---------------------------------------------------------------
War on terror - Landing by remote control doesn't quite fly with pilots
By Jeff Long
Tribune staff reporter
Published September 28, 2001
The military has been flying planes and landing them safely by remote control for years, but airline pilots say questions about security must be answered before that
technology is used aboard commercial jetliners to thwart hijackers the way President Bush suggested Thursday during a speech in Chicago.
"We will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our airlines are safe," Bush said at O'Hare International Airport. "... including technology to enable controllers to
take over distressed aircraft and land it by remote control."
Pilots said after the speech that though they support other proposals for airplane security that Bush outlined, the idea of aircraft being remotely controlled concerns them.
"If the good guys can take control of the plane" from the ground, said John Mazor, a spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association, "maybe the bad guys can take control of it
too."
Taking control of a hijacked aircraft from the ground appears to be less feasible than other measures, he said.
"We would view that as a very--very--long-term type of undertaking," Mazor said. "There are enormous technical difficulties in trying to rig up an aircraft for that."
But companies that have designed such systems for the military say it wouldn't be difficult to adapt the technology for commercial aircraft.
Why did USAF pilots name the 1950s designed Vietnam era F105 Thunderchief a THUD? Because it made a BIG THUD when it hit the ground while using an autopilot with
Low Altitude Terrain Following RADAR
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. developed a remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force called Predator, which flew in Bosnia during the conflict
there. Used by the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked by satellite using controls on the ground or ordering an onboard computer to do the job.
Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of the San Diego company, said he sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.
"Such a system would not prevent a hijacker from causing mayhem on the aircraft or exploding a device and destroying the aircraft in flight," the letter said, "but it would
prevent him from flying the aircraft into a building or populated areas."
Cassidy said Thursday that a pilot aboard a commercial airliner could turn the plane's guidance over to ground controllers at the press of a button, preventing a hijacker--or
anyone else aboard--from flying the plane.
That system also would keep people on the ground from taking control of a plane away from the pilot, Cassidy said, because the pilot would first have to give up control.
Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from just one or two locations using satellite links, Cassidy said. Those locations could be heavily fortified
against terrorists.
"The technology is available," Cassidy said. "We use it every day."
Copyright © 2002, Chicago Tribune
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://home.att.net/~jbaugher2/b17_14.html
World War 2 - BQ-7 - Operation APHRODITE
Last revised July 25, 1999
Approximately 25 high-time Fortresses (mainly B-17Fs) were converted into radio-controlled flying bombs under the designation BQ-7. They were designed to be used
against German V-1 missile sites, submarine pens, or deep fortifications that had resisted conventional bombing.
The name of the USAAF officer who first thought of the idea of using war-weary B-17s as flying bombs has been lost to history, but the plan was proposed to Maj Gen
James Doolittle under the code name Operation Aphrodite, and he approved it on June 26, 1944. Responsibility for preparing and flying the drone aircraft was given to the
3rd Bombardment Division, which passed the job down to the 388th Bombardment Group, which in turn passed responsibility down to the 562nd Squadron based at
Honington in Suffolk.
The B-17s selected for the project were stripped of their normal military equipment and packed with up to 9 tons of explosives. Each pilotless bomber was fitted with a
radio-controlled flight system known as Double-Azon. A television camera was placed on the flight deck so that an image of the main instrument panel could be sent back
to a controlling aircraft. A second TV camera was installed inside the Plexiglas nose which gave a television monitor in the controlling aircraft a view of the ground so that
the robot machine could be directed onto the target. It was planned that a volunteer two-man crew would get the ship off the ground and fly it up to an operational altitude of
2000 feet, point the aircraft in the general direction of the target, arm the explosives for an on-impact detonation, hand over control to the director aircraft that was flying
above at 20,000 feet, and then parachute to safety while still over England. The canopy was removed from each aircraft, creating an open cockpit so that the two-man crew
could exit the plane with minimum delay once they had completed their tasks. The controlling B-17 would then direct the BQ-7 to the target area over the Continent and lock
its controls into a crash course into the target before turning to escape.
Upon completion of the training program, the squadron with its 10 drones and four command ships moved to an airfield at Woodbridge, which was a few miles from the
Suffolk coast northeast of London. They then moved to a small satellite airfield at Fersfield, 25 miles from Woodbridge, in a very isolated area that was well away from any
civilian areas.
The first mission took place on August 4. The target was a V-1 site in Pas-de-Calais. In the first phase of the mission, two motherships and two drones took off.
Unfortunately, one of the drones went out of control shortly after the first crewman had bailed out. It crashed near the coastal village of Orford, destroying two acres of trees
and digging an enormous crater. The body of the other crewman was never found. The second drone was successfully dispatched toward the Pas-de-Calais.
Unfortunately, clouds obscured the television view from the nose just as the drone approached the target site, and the plane missed the target by 500 feet. The second
phase of the mission fared little better. One robot BQ-7 had a control malfunction before it could dive onto its target and was shot down by German flak. The other one
missed its target by 500 yards.
On August 6, another task force of two robots and four command ships was sent out against V-1 targets in France. The crews parachuted clear of the aircraft without
incident, but within minutes one of the drones went out of control and crashed into the sea. The other drone decided to develop a mind of its own and the
explosives-packed aircraft began to circle the industrial area of Ipswich before flying out to sea, where it was harmlessly ditched.
After these early failures, General Doolittle decided that it might be a good idea to suspend further missions until it could be determined what was going wrong. Most of the
advisers pointed the finger at the Double-Azon radio control system and recommended conversion to a new system known as Castor.
The first *Castor* raid was an attack on targets at Heligoland. Again, it started badly--the parachute of the pilot of one of the drones failed to open when he bailed out, and
he was killed. Nevertheless, the drone made it all the way to Heligoland, but it crashed some 100 yards short of the target, probably a victim of flak. The next mission was
against targets on Heide/Hemmingstedt. The first robot crashed short of its target because of director disorientation caused by image distortion in the television monitor,
whereas the second robot malfunctioned and had to be ditched at sea.
Further sorties against Heligoland took place in October, but yielded little success. One drone was shot down by flak, whereas another went out of control and ended up
over the North Sea where it finally ran out of fuel and crashed into the water. A third drone failed to locate its target due to low visibility. The exasperated director crew pointed
the BQ-7 in the general direction of Berlin and let it go. The fourth drone actually crashed near its target and caused some serious damage and fairly heavy casualties.
On October 27, the headquarters of the US Strategic Air Forces in Europe concluded that these attacks by BQ-7s against hard targets were not yielding much success, and
decided that further targets for the BQ-7s would be industrial targets in large German cities. The first of these sorties was on December 5, the target being a group of
railroad marshaling yards west of Hannover. Because of bad weather, the first robot could not find the primary target, and was shot down by flak while approaching the
secondary target. The second robot failed to explode when it crashed, leaving the Germans with a relatively undamaged aircraft with a complete set of remote controls that
they could examine. The last Aphrodite mission was on January 20, 1945, against a power station at Oldenberg. Both drones missed their targets by several miles. After
this last effort, the *Aphrodite* concept was abandoned as being unfeasible.
In retrospect, the Aphrodite concept was a costly failure, and was often more dangerous to the crews which operated the drones than it was to the Germans. It turned out
that the hardware available in 1944 was simply not good enough to do the kind of job that was required.
Incidentally, the BQ-7 was NOT the plane responsible for the death of Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. The plane that killed JFK's older brother was a converted Consolidated
PB4Y-1, a Navy version of the B-24 Liberator.
---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2002/n04162002_200204163.html
From U.S. Civil War to Afghanistan: A Short History of UAVs
By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service
DEFENSE LINK
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
WASHINGTON, April 16, 2002 -- During the American Civil War, both sides tried to use rudimentary unmanned aerial vehicles.
According to Dyke Weatherington, deputy of the Defense UAV Office, Union and Confederate forces launched balloons loaded with explosive devices. The idea, he said,
was for the balloons to come down inside a supply or ammunition depot and explode. "It wasn't terribly effective," he said during a recent interview.
The Japanese tried a similar ploy late in World War II. They launched balloon bombs laden with incendiary and other explosives. The theory was high-altitude winds would
carry the balloons over the United States, where the bombs would start forest fires and cause panic and mayhem. The Japanese weren't able to gauge their success and
so called it a flop and quit after about a month.
The United States also tried a type of UAV during World War II called Operation Aphrodite. "There were some rudimentary attempts to use manned aircraft in an unmanned
role. The limitation there was, we didn't have the technology to launch these systems on their own and control them" Weatherington said.
Allied forces used the modified manned aircraft basically as cruise missiles. The idea was a pilot would take off, get the plane to altitude, ensure it was stable and then
pass control to another aircraft through a radio link before bailing out.
It was on one such top-secret Operation Aphrodite mission in 1944 that President John Kennedy's older brother, Navy Lt. Joseph P. Kennedy Jr., died when his bomber
mysteriously exploded after takeoff.
During the Vietnam War, technology started to make UAVs more effective. Weatherington said they were used fairly extensively and were called drones.
Large numbers of modified Firebee drones overflew North Vietnam. The aircraft, about the size of today's Predator UAV, launched first for simple day reconnaissance
missions at varying altitude levels. "They had conventional cameras in them," Weatherington said. "Later on, they were used for other missions such as night photo, comint
and elint, leaflet dropping and surface-to-air missile (SAM) radar detection, location and identification."
One of these Firebees hangs in the Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, amassing over 65 individual missions. As a whole, Firebees flew over
3,400 sorties during the Vietnam War.
Several of the UAVs we know today owe much to Israel, which develops UAVs aggressively. The U.S. Hunter and Pioneer UAVs are direct derivatives of Israeli systems,
Weatherington said.
The Navy and Marine Corps operate the Pioneer UAV system has been in operation since 1985. Once during Desert Storm, Iraqi troops actually surrendered to a Pioneer.
At the time, the battleship USS Missouri used its Pioneer to spot for its 16-inch main guns and devastate the defenses of Faylaka Island, which is off the Kuwaiti coast near
Kuwait City.
Shortly after, while still over the horizon and invisible to the defenders, the USS Wisconsin deliberately flew its Pioneer low over Faylaka Island. When the Iraqi defenders
heard the sound of the UAV's two-cycle engine, they knew they were targeted for more naval shelling. The Iraqis signaled surrender by waving handkerchiefs, undershirts
and bed sheets.
Following the Gulf War, military officials recognized the worth of the unmanned systems. The Predator started life as an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
project. The program hurried the development of the Predator along, and it demonstrated its worth in the skies over the Balkans.
The Predator operates between 15,000 and 25,000 feet. It carries three sensor systems: a color video camera and synthetic-aperture radar.
The Air Force has also placed Hellfire missiles aboard the Predator. In the near future, the UAV might aim a laser at a target and attack it. The combat Predator can also
mark targets with its laser for other aircraft or read targets marked by other sources.
Predator is not an all-weather system, however. As an result of lessons-learned in the Balkans, Predator employs a simple anti-icing system allows it to exit the icing
condition but will not allow it to conduct continuous operations in the condition. The new Predator B has a number of characteristics that will better allow it to deal with a
wider range of environmental events including icing conditions.
The Global Hawk is a jet-powered UAV taking to the skies over Afghanistan. Still under development, it is at the same stage the Predator was when it first flew over Bosnia.
The Global Hawk operates around 60,000 feet, and its suite of sensors is akin to what the U-2 reconnaissance plane carries.
Global Hawk does not carry a very sophisticated signal intelligence system, Weatherington said. But, tests show the Global Hawk has great potential in this area and the
Air Force continues to develop its full capability.
Persistence is a unique capability for UAVs, Weatherington said. The Predator can stay in the air for up to 40 hours. The Global Hawk -- at ranges measured in thousands
of miles -- can loiter in an area for more than 24 hours.
So what's up for the future in UAVs? The Air Force and Navy are designing and testing combat UAVs. The Army is developing a tactical UAV called Shadow 200. This will
give leaders "over-the-hill" surveillance capabilities. The Marine Corps has Dragon Eye, a small, hand launched UAV that can give small-unit leaders a picture of the
battleground.
Some UAVs under development will be "as small as your hand," Weatherington said. "In the future it may be that a small UAV could fly into the window of a building, land at
some innocuous location and observe activities."
-----------------------------------------------------
http://mdw.army.mil/news/Contingency_Planning.html
Pentagon MASCAL exercise simulates scenarios in preparing for emergencies
Military District of Washington - News: Contingency planning
PENTAGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS
Washington, D.C., Nov. 3, 2000
The fire and smoke from the downed passenger aircraft billows from the Pentagon courtyard. Defense Protective Services Police seal the crash sight. Army medics, nurses
and doctors scramble to organize aid. An Arlington Fire Department chief dispatches his equipment to the affected areas.
Don Abbott, of Command Emergency Response Training, walks over to the Pentagon and extinguishes the flames. The Pentagon was a model and the "plane crash" was
a simulated one.
The Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise, as the crash was called, was just one of several scenarios that emergency response teams were exposed to Oct. 24-26 in the
Office of the Secretaries of Defense conference room.
On Oct. 24, there was a mock terrorist incident at the Pentagon Metro stop and a construction accident to name just some of the scenarios that were practiced to better
prepare local agencies for real incidents.
To conduct the exercise, emergency personnel hold radios that are used to rush help to the proper places, while toy trucks representing rescue equipment are pushed
around the exercise table.
Cards are then passed out to the various players designating the number of casualties and where they should be sent in a given scenario.
To conduct the exercise, a medic reports to Army nurse Maj. Lorie Brown a list of 28 casualties so far. Brown then contacts her superior on the radio, Col. James Geiling, a
doctor in the command room across the hall.
Geiling approves Brown's request for helicopters to evacuate the wounded. A policeman in the room recommends not moving bodies and Abbott, playing the role of
referee, nods his head in agreement.
"If you have to move dead bodies to get to live bodies, that's okay," Abbott says as the situation unfolds.
Geiling remarked on the importance of such exercises.
"The most important thing is who are the players?" Geiling said. "And what is their modus operandi?" Brown thought the exercise was excellent preparation for any potential
disasters.
"This is important so that we're better prepared," Brown said. "This is to work out the bugs. Hopefully it will never happen, but this way we're prepared."
An Army medic found the practice realistic.
"You get to see the people that we'll be dealing with and to think about the scenarios and what you would do," Sgt. Kelly Brown said. "It's a real good scenario and one that
could happen easily."
A major player in the exercise was the Arlington Fire Department.
Our role is fire and rescue," Battalion Chief R.W. Cornwell said. "We get to see how each other operates and the roles and responsibilities of each. You have to plan for
this. Look at all the air traffic around here."
Each participant was required to fill out an evaluation form after the training exercise.
We go over scenarios that are germane to the Pentagon," Jake Burrell of the Pentagon Emergency Management Team said. 'You play the way you practice. We want people
to go back to their organizations and look at their S.O.P. (standard operating procedure) and see how they responded to any of the incidents."
Burrell has coordinated these exercises for four years and he remarked that his team gets better each year.
Abbott, in his after action critique, reminded the participants that the actual disaster is only one-fifth of the incident and that the whole emergency would run for seven to 20
days and might involve as many as 17 agencies.
The emergency to a certain extent is the easiest part, Abbott said. He reminded the group of the personal side of a disaster. Families wanting to come to the crash sight for
closure.
In this particular crash there would have been 341 victims.
(Ryan is a staff writer with the Fort Myer Military Community's Pentagram.)
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/cia-simulation.htm
http://www.nlsi.net
http://www.nlsi.net/hs-alc-info.htm
On 9/11, CIA Was Running Simulation of a Plane Crashing into a Building
>>> Here's another admission which destroys the government's lie that it couldn't possibly have foreseen the use of planes to ram buildings. And explains why NORAD
was tricked into not intercepting the hijacked airliners - CIA: "It's just a wargame exercise."
The National Law Enforcement and Security Institute will be holding a conference called "Homeland Security: America's Leadership Challenge" in Chicago on 6 Sept 2002.
The star speaker is Rudolph Giuliani. One of the other speakers is CIA man John Fulton. Here is the crucial sentence from the promotional literature for the conference:
On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team at the CIA were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would
be created if a plane were to strike a building.
Fulton's entire passage from the promotional literature
John Fulton - Intelligence Networking & Analysis
On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team at the CIA were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would
be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day. Information is the most powerful tool
available in the homeland security effort. At the core of every initiative currently underway to protect our country and its citizens is the challenge of getting the right information
to the right people at the right time. How can so much information from around the world be captured and processed in meaningful and timely ways? Mr. Fulton shares his
insights into the intelligence community, and shares a vision of how today's information systems will be developed into even better counter-terrorism tools of tomorrow.
About John Fulton
John Fulton's 25 years in the intelligence community has contributed to his recognition as an expert in risk & threat response analysis, scenario gaming, and strategic
planning. He is on staff for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), currently serving as Chief of the Strategic War Gaming Division of the National Reconnaissance Office, and
as a member of U.S. Joint Forces Command's Project Alpha - a prestigious "think tank" for advanced concepts related to such issues as homeland security. He formerly
served as the mission director for our nation's satellite imagery program as well as replacing Army Astronaut Same Gemar as the Director of the National Security Space
Master Plan for the U.S. Department of Defense and Intelligence Space Communities under the auspices of the Deputy UnderSecretary of Defense (Space).
His counter-terrorism and homeland security responsibilities include advising the Director Central Intelligence Staff for Homeland Security, the U.S. Marshall's Office, and
collaboration with the National Security Council.
In the private sector Fulton has developed a number of patents related to positioning, "smart GPS " applications, communications, and audio/video technology. He
oversees the development of public & personal safety applications of these capabilities through SafeSTAR projects, and contributes to the strategic planning and
conceptual design of the SafeSTAR Homeland Security Command Center.
See this info on the NLSI's Website.
Welcome to the National Law Enforcement & Security Institute
Homeland Security Leadership Event Join us on Sept. 6 in Chicago for a special leadership event - Homeland Security: America's Leadership Challenge, featuring former
NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, United Airlines Captain Dennis Fitch, Motorola President Mike Zafirovski, CIA's John Fulton, and NLSI Director Dan Kane.
Community Connect provides important information to parents during a school emergency with automatic calls to home, work, and mobile phones. Learn how you can help
your school get connected!
See more information about FAST - Flight Attendant Safety Training.
See video clips in the NLSI News & Media section; or learn more about curriculum development and the internationally-known experts on the NLSI Training Advisory Board.
World-renown combatives instructor, author, Black Belt Magazine Hall of Fame Member and NLSI Advisory Board Member, W. Hock Hochheim will present the first-ever
Close Quarters Combat Group Training Camp at NLSI. NLSI offers special training for VIP Protection certification, taught by leading experts.
National Law Enforcement & Security Institute
SafeSTAR Homeland Security Command Center
World Headquarters
1673 NE 70th Avenue
Ankeny (Des Moines), Iowa 50021 USA
(515) 280-NLSI / (800) 397-NLSI
Also see Staff Contacts and Map
Homeland Security -- America's Leadership Challenge
Friday, September 6th
9 AM - 4 PM
Stephens Convention Center
Rosemont (Chicago) IL
Register Here
or Call 800-659-3730
* Rudy Giuliani, former Mayor of New York City NLSI presents an exciting one-day leadership event
* Captain Dennis Fitch, United Airlines to support and inspire public safety, business, and
* Mike Zafirovski, President, Motorola Inc. community leaders by encouraging involvement in the
* John Fulton, Central Intelligence Agency homeland security effort, and sharing information
* Dan Kane, National Law Enforcement & Security Inst. to help everyone succeed.
Open to the public, tickets required.
Who should Attend: Business Leaders, Police/Fire/EMS Personnel, City & State Government Personnel, Security Directors, Health Care Professionals, Emergency
Response Coordinators, City Council Members, Criminal Justice System Personnel, Public Utility Staff, Community Leaders
"America's Mayor" Rudy Giuliani will lead the day with his presentation "Leadership in Difficult Times", followed by the amazing story of Captain Dennis Fitch and the crew of
United Airlines Flight 232. Mike Zafirovski of Motorola, Inc. speaks about Personal Security & Public Safety Technology.
---------------------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/mafia_mobsters_suck/mobbed_up_mayor_of_ny_city
Rudy's Kin Tied to Mob
Father, uncle and cousin surface in new biography
By MICHAEL R. BLOOD
Daily News City Hall Bureau Chief
From: News and Views - City Beat
Thursday, July 06, 2000
Mayor Giuliani — a former federal prosecutor who won notice for pursuing the Mafia — had relatives linked to organized crime, including a mobbed-up cousin who was
gunned down by FBI agents in 1977, a new book says.
Lewis D'Avanzo, a son of the mayor's uncle and a guest at Giuliani's first wedding in 1968, was a "ruthless and widely feared mob associate" who headed a massive
stolen car ring, according to FBI documents and interviews detailed in "Rudy! An Investigative Biography of Rudolph Giuliani," by Village Voice senior editor Wayne Barrett.
Due in stores next week, the book sketches a largely unflattering portrait of the clan, depicting his father, Harold, as a hothead and the "muscle" behind a brother-in-law's
loansharking operation, run out of a Brooklyn bar.
Along with cracking heads, it says the mayor's father served time in state prison for a stickup, rarely held an on-the-books job and once was a gunman in a mob shootout in
Brighton Beach, Brooklyn.
The book never makes clear how much of the family's alleged dark side is known to the mayor, who has talked lovingly of his father, who died in 1981 of prostate cancer —
the same disease that the mayor is fighting.
The mayor's spokeswoman, Sunny Mindel, said yesterday that Giuliani "hadn't seen the book and had no comment." On Tuesday, Giuliani defended his father as "a
complete man" who taught him the value of honesty, but the mayor refused to address questions about his father's alleged criminal past.
"The details of his life died with him," the mayor said.
And they almost stayed that way.
Barrett said a source told him the elder Giuliani had spent time behind bars, but the author couldn't find city court records documenting it.
Barrett eventually looked in the 1934 state prison archives in Albany and discovered a single sheet — a Sing Sing Prison receiving blotter — that listed Harold Giuliani at the
top of the page. On the next line, Barrett found the key to the story: Harold Giuliani's alias, Joseph Starrett.
Barrett then found all the New York court records under the name Starrett. Initial excerpts of the book appeared in Talk magazine and in this week's Voice; another excerpt
was released yesterday.
According to the book, Giuliani's cousin Lewis D'Avanzo was known as "Steve the Blond" and listed as armed and dangerous in FBI bulletins. His criminal record included
a 10-year federal sentence for the armed hijacking of a truck loaded with $240,000 worth of mercury. The book alleges that he was suspected of taking part in several
murders.
D'Avanzo was gunned down by the FBI in October 1977, when he tried to run down an agent after being stopped on a warrant that accused him and two associates of
transporting 100 stolen luxury cars.
Quoting an unnamed friend of D'Avanzo, the book describes a 1962 shootout pitting a local mobster against the mayor's father and Leo D'Avanzo, Lewis D'Avanzo's father.
The book says Leo was later sanctioned by mob bosses for shooting at a Mafia member.
Born two years apart, Giuliani and his cousin attended the same elementary and high schools, but Giuliani's father forbade the two from spending much time together.
Giuliani met D'Avanzo's wife, Lois, only once — at the mayor's first wedding, to Regina Peruggi, the book says.
The book says Leo D'Avanzo, who was known in family circles as a black sheep, ran loansharking and gambling operations out of a Brooklyn bar where Giuliani's father
worked as a bartender.
In his role as debt collector, his father "broke legs, smashed kneecaps, crunched noses," the book says.
Leo D'Avanzo left town after the shootout, and gave the bar to Harold Giuliani, the book said.
Based on interviews with family members, the book also claims that Joan Ellen D'Avanzo, a cousin who at one time lived with Giuliani when he was a youngster, became a
drug addict who was beaten to death in 1973 at age 34. Her cause of death was listed as undetermined, but several family members said she was murdered.
---------------------------------------------------
http://www.examiner.com/news/default.jsp?story=n.lawyer.0611w
Publication date: 06/11/2002
S.F. attorney: Bush allowed 9/11
BY DAVID KIEFER
Of The Examiner Staff
Stanley Hilton now figures his case is stronger because of a coalition of attorneys, victims' families and bipartisan legislators who gathered in Washington on Monday to
condemn the government's lack of action in preventing the Sept. 11 attacks.
Hilton is the San Francisco attorney who filed a $7 billion lawsuit in U.S. District Court on June 3 against President Bush and other government officials for "allowing" the
terrorist attacks to occur.
Among Hilton's allegations: Bush conspired to create the Sept. 11 attacks for his own political gain and has been using Osama bin Laden as a scapegoat.
Hilton said he has information that bin Laden died several years ago of kidney failure.
"I hope it will expose the fact that there are numbers of people in the government, including Bush and his top assistants, who wanted this to happen," Hilton said.
His class-action suit named 10 defendants, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,
and Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta. Hilton said he represents the families of 14 victims and that 400 plaintiffs are involved nationwide.
White House spokesman Ken Macias and Department of Justice public affairs officer Charles Miller each said their departments were unaware of the lawsuit.
Hilton, Sen. Bob Dole's former aide, has been publicly critical of conservatives in books he has written about Dole and the Clinton sex scandal. Hilton, who said he has
sources within the FBI, CIA, the National Security Agency and Naval intelligence, demands Bush's impeachment and believes the truth will come out in trial.
Hilton claims the Bush administration ignored intelligence information, refused to round up suspected terrorists beforehand, and during the hijackings refused to disable
pilot controls and switch to a ground-based remote system.
He claims the government benefited from installing a puppet Afghan government friendly to U.S. oil interests.
Hilton also says Bush used bin Laden's antagonist image to create a public frenzy, which allowed the Bush administration to tighten its political grip.
E-mail: dkiefer@sfexaminer.com
audio file of Stanley Hilton interview on http://infowars.com radio:
http://prisonplanet.com/audio.html
americanautobahn.com
add your comments
Killer NATO UN Corporate Jetplanes
by John Lee • Thursday November 06, 2003 at 06:40 PM
knoxpulse@yahoo.com Knoxville TN
CONSPIRACY FACTORY - PENTAGON PACIFIED BY CRUISE MISSLE - HUNT THE INVISIBLE BOEING 757:
http://www.geocities.com/killtown
http://www.geocities.com/s911surprise3b/american_airlines_flight_77
http://www.pentagate.info
http://www.effroyable-imposture.net
http://thepowerhour.com
"Without censorship, things can get terribly 'confused' in the public mind."
–General William Westmoreland, Commander U.S. under United Nations (UN) Corporation SEcurity Council headed by Communist Russian general who lost the
"Vietnam" War
"It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke
started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards."
—CNN.COM, "Up to 800 possibly dead at Pentagon", September 12, 2001
Steve Patterson, 43, said he was watching television reports of the World Trade Center being hit when he saw a silver commuter jet fly past the window of his 14th-floor
apartment in Pentagon City. The plane was about 150 yards away, approaching from the west about 20 feet off the ground, Patterson said. He said the plane, which
sounded like the high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet, flew over Arlington cemetary so low that he thought it was going to land on I-395. He said it was flying so fast that he
couldn't read any writing on the side. The plane, which appeared to hold about eight to 12 people, headed straight for the Pentagon but was flying as if coming in for a
landing on a nonexistent runway, Patterson said. Eyewitness described a small jet aircraft seating a maximum of 12 passengers and crew, NOT an airliner, flying "like a
fighter jet" at high speed below treetop level.
—News reports reposted on WhatReallyHappened.com
WAV TV AUDIO FILES ON BUSH ORDER TO SHOOT DOWN UA93:
http://www.geocities.com/united_airlines_flight_93
"It was at this point that President Bush is said to have issued his shoot order. F-16s from Langley flew protective patterns over Washington. United Flight 93 crashed
outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 10.03am. The rumours that this plane was shot down are based on the fact that debris was found up to eight miles from the crash
site, that one of the passengers talking on a mobile phone reported hearing an explosion and seeing a plume of white smoke in the cabin, and that eyewitnesses saw a
second aircraft in the sky at the time of the crash."
—The Independent, London, 20 September, 2001
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=95051
----------------------------------------------------------
Dick Cheney gives Bush the credit in Meet the Press:
"MR. RUSSERT: What's the most important decision you think he made during the course of the day?
"VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, the--I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft.
"MR. RUSSERT: And you decided?
"VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and
tanker support so they could stay up a long time...
"It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give them instructions to act, if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate.
"MR. RUSSERT: So if the United States government became aware that a hijacked commercial airline[r] was destined for the White House or the Capitol, we would take the
plane down?
"VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yes. The president made the decision...that if the plane would not divert...as a last resort, our pilots were authorized to take them out. Now, people
say, you know, that's a horrendous decision to make. Well, it is. You've got an airplane full of American citizens, civilians, captured by...terrorists, headed and are you going
to, in fact, shoot it down, obviously, and kill all those Americans on board?
"...It's a presidential-level decision, and the president made, I think, exactly the right call in this case, to say, "I wished we'd had combat air patrol up over New York."
--NBC, 'Meet the Press' 16 September 2001
---------------------------------------------------
Mr. Rumsfeld [US Secretary of War] confirmed a report in The New York Times today that President Bush had authorized two midlevel Air Force generals to order hijacked
passenger jets that threaten American cities shot down. "It is a process that works," Mr. Rumsfeld said. Gen. Henry H. Shelton, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
said the Air Force and Air National Guard pilots of the more than 100 aircraft now on alert at 26 bases. "I don't think we've thought through the moral implications of this,"
General Loh said. "I find the whole idea to be reprehensible."
—New York Times, September 28, 2001
Nashua, New Hampshire - Controllers have also learned that an F-16 fighter closely pursued hijacked United Airlines Flight 93 until it crashed in southwestern
Pennsylvania, the employee said. Although controllers don't have complete details of the Air Force's chase of the Boeing 757, they have learned the F-16 made 360-degree
turns to remain close to the commercial jet, the employee said. "He must've seen the whole thing," the employee said of the F-16 pilot's view of Flight 93's crash.
—ALBERT McKEON, The Telegraph, "FAA worker says hijacked jeltiners almost collided before striking World Trade Center", September 13, 2001
SHANKSVILLE, Pa. - As investigators continued to search for clues to the crash of United Flight 93, people in this Allegheny Mountains hamlet were talking about a parallel
mystery that one man called "the damndest darn thing" he'd ever seen. In separate interviews Thursday, five residents who live and work less than four miles from the
crash site said they saw a second plane flying erratically within minutes of the crash of the Boeing 757 that took off from Newark two hours earlier Tuesday morning. Susan
Mcelwain of Stonycreek Township said a small white jet with rear engines and no discernible markings swooped low over her minivan near an intersection and
disappeared over a hilltop, nearly clipping the tops of trees lining the ridge. An official at the Cleveland Air Traffic Control Center in Overland, Ohio, which tracked Flight 93 as
it turned in the sky and tracked eastward from the Cleveland area, said "no comment" when asked if there was any record of a second plane over the crash site. "That's
something that the FBI is working on and I cannot talk about," said Richard Kettel, head of tower operations at the Cleveland center.
—JEFF PILLETS, The Record (Bergen County, NJ), "IN RURAL HAMLET, THE MYSTERY MOUNTS; 5 REPORT SECOND PLANE AT PA. CRASH SITE", September 14, 2001
"There is no category of 'enemy airliners,' " a recently retired F.A.A. official said. He and others said they could not recall any instance in which a military plane fired on a
civilian one in the United States, though in 1983 a F-4 Phantom fighter that scrambled to intercept an unidentified target off Cherry Point, N.C., accidentally rammed it. That
plane was a private twin-engine propeller plane on the way home from the Bahamas, carrying seven people. An F.A.A. spokeswoman said earlier this week that there was
a policy for shooting down civilian airliners but would not divulge it. And shooting down a jet as large as a Boeing 757 or 767 raises other problems. One F.A.A. official said,
"If you keep it from hitting a government building, it's going to hit something else."
—Matthew L. Wald, New York Times, "AFTER THE ATTACKS: SKY RULES; Pentagon Tracked Deadly Jet But Found No Way to Stop It", 15 September 2001
U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in Tuesday's terror attacks received training at
secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s. THREE OF THE alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in
Pensacola, Fla.—known as the "Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation," according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source. The three foreign nationals training in Pensacola appear to be
Saeed Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the four men who allegedly commandeered United Airlines Flight 93.
—NEWSWEEK, September 15, 2001
Three days ago, I learned from someone at ABC News that ABC had videotape -- an angle of the second plane crashing into the tower—that showed an F-16 fighter jet
trailing the plane at a distance [Drudge Report has the only photos shown of this from Fox News]. From this point, I will pass on any censored information to those of you in
the mainstream media who are being blocked from reporting. Is it becoming more clear now that the plane that went down in Pennsylvania was shot down to prevent it
from attacking its destination?
—Michael Moore, producer of The Awful Truth TV show, mmflint@aol.com, http://www.michaelmoore.com
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1414339,00.html
Conspiracy theorists love 9/11
11/09/2003 11:16 - (SA)
Hamburg - The smoke had still not cleared from the rubble of the World Trade Centre as the first conspiracy theory did its round.
Some people claimed the visage of the Devil was visible for a moment as the building collapsed. Then there were also claims that the French physician Nostradamus
(1503-1566) prophesied the attacks.
Lies and half-truths have a way of working themselves into people's minds although there is not a shred of evidence that anyone but a group of young men bent on terror
conducted the attacks.
Conspiracy books, especially those claiming the United States was the true author of 9/11, have been best-sellers, especially in Germany and France. There are dozens of
Internet sites claiming to broadcast the supposed "truth" about September 11.
"Put out a badly written book claiming a worldwide conspiracy and everyone will buy it," said Hans Leyendecker, a journalist at the Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper of
Munich, recently.
"How come we are all so stupid?"
The more idiotic the questions, the more the authors preen over their supposed insight, Leyendecker reckons.
Remote control
"Did George W Bush prompt the attacks on Washington and New York so he could seize maximum power? Were the jets that slammed into the Twin Towers flown by
remote control from the White House? Did the president's brother, Jeb Bush, suppress evidence to help the family?"
After largely ignoring the theories, the German media has had a field day this week pointing up the absurdities of the allegations.
The cover of the news magazine Der Spiegel on Monday showed the burning World Trade Centre turned upside down, and the cover story was headed Panorama of the
Absurd and listed all the ways the conspiracy theorists had ignored or misinterpreted facts.
"They treat every seemingly inconsistent detail as a form of proof for their bogus theories," the magazine said.
"Instead of going out and digging for the missing facts, conspiracy theorists interpret the gaps in their own knowledge as evidence in its own right, that allows them to
insinuate manipulation by shadowy police and secret services."
The king of the German conspiracy theorists is Andreas von Buelow, 66, a lawyer who was Germany's minister of science more than 20 years ago.
World takeover
His prestige as a former state-secretary for defence and member of the parliamentary committee overseeing intelligence services has helped to sell his theory that the US
secret services steered the jetliners into the World Trade Centre and fired a cruise missile at the Pentagon to create the grounds for a US takeover of the world.
The most remarkable sales success has been a book by a Berlin journalist, Mathias Broeckers, 49, who did most of his research on the Internet and claims the attacks
were cooked up by the United States so it could invade Afghanistan and win an oil pipeline.
So far the book has reached its 31st printing and 130 000 copies have been sold. Zweitausendeins Verlag, the Berlin publisher, denies that the "research" is amateur.
Pubisher Lutz Kroth declares, "We think the public should be allowed to discuss the facts."
German conspiracy theorists met on Sunday in Berlin to swap ideas about September 11.
19% believe it
The German weekly newspaper Die Zeit conducted a survey earlier this year that found 19% of Germans now believe the Bush administration was the author of the attacks.
Among young people, the credulousness is even greater: nearly one third of those under 30 say it is "possible" the United States rained destruction on itself.
The leftist Berlin newspaper Taz, famous for blunt headlines, reported this with the heading, Germans have a screw loose. The result was a flood of letters to the editor
from conspiracy-minded readers.
Taz suggests anti-American sentiment is on the rise in Germany, blinding better judgement.
In France, conspiracy theorists are led by Thierry Meyssan, whose book September 11, 2001: The Awful Confidence Trick appeared in March 2002. He claims the World
Trade Centre could not have collapsed from plane strikes alone, and denies any jet hit the Pentagon.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1592090281/102-9263544-9339316?v=glance
A French book, The Awful Lies, ripped apart Meyssan's claims, but the theorist is still at it, with a new book entitled Pentagate.
Conspiracy theories have been widely reported in Middle East nations as well, but have made very little headway in the United States, where much of the population knew,
at least indirectly, someone who died in the jets, the two towers or the Pentagon.
Americans have been more susceptible to far-fetched books claiming the intelligence services could have prevented the attacks but were too lax, or that Saudi leaders are
posing as US allies while allegedly in cahoots with al-Qaeda.
-------------------------------------------
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1559000/1559151.stm
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has
turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American
Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been
in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi
press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Dayton Beach in the United States, and is indeed the
same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is
currently on a further training course in Morocco.
Mistaken identity
Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.
He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.
Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.
The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.
Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed
Alghamdi.
He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.
And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar [AA77 that allegedly hit Pentagon], may
also be alive.
FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in
doubt.
Vaporized Hijacking suspects
Flight 175: Marwan Al-Shehhi, Fayez Ahmed, Mohald Alshehri, Hamza Alghamdi and Ahmed Alghamdi
Flight 11: Waleed M Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari and Satam Al Suqami
Flight 77: Khalid Al-Midhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Hani Hanjour
Flight 93: Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, Ziad Jarrahi and Saeed Alghamdi
--------------------------------------------
re CNN News video interview of Thierry Meyssan showing video of the tiny 4-foot-wide hole in Pentagon and tiny 2-foot-wide turbine blade from cruise missle drone or
Global Hawk drone in Pentagon rubble:
"I think even the suggestion of it is ludicrous. And finally, it is just an incredible, incredible insult to the friends and the relatives and the family members of the almost 200
people that got killed here on September 11th and the thousands who were killed in New York."
Department of Defense News Briefing, Victoria Clarke, April 24, 2002 (Clarke, a 20-year Pentagon PR propagandist, is now employed by CNN full time in October 2003)
http://www.effroyable-imposture.net
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm
in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war: neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the
leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
-Hermann Goering, NAZI Luftwaffe chief of staff, testimony at Nuremburg warcrimes trials, sentenced to death, convicted of setting the Reichstag arson (committed suicide
by cyanide out of fear of hangman's noose)
"The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union). Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a
United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."
—President George "Poppy" Bush Sr, arrested as VP for DUI with his mistress, sued under RICO Act for narcoterrorism during Iran-Iraq-Contra prosecutions and
convictions, who armed Saddam Hussein and Iraq DURING the 1st Gulf War, who's daddy Prescott Bush was arrested 3 times DURING World War 2 and paid a $750,000
fine for selling Adolf "Hitler" Shicklegruber Rothschild half the steel used by the NAZIs, September 11, 1991
"It turns out that neocon U.S. Army General Tommy Franks, Centcom Commander and head of U.S. troops in the Iraqi war, is Jewish. Seen on MSNBC reviewing the troops
in Baghdad, Franks shocked some by proudly giving the Communist clenched fist, outreached arms signal rather than the traditional U.S. military salute. At a press
conference on March 25, 2003, General Franks stated, 'The media is a weapon of war.'"
—Professor Texe Marrs, USAF (retired), "Jewish NeoCons: Covert Enemies of the USA," Power of Prophesy Radio News, October 2003 (Iraqi oil pipeline to Jordan diverted
to Israel for free - Israel seizes ownership of Iraqi real estate after 30,000 US soldiers died in Gulf Oil Wars)
http://www.texemarrs.com/jewish_neocons_covert_enemies.htm
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0423/p11s01-coop.html
http://gulfwarvets.com
"A 'Semite' is any person living in that area, including Arabs and Christians. It's time we start talking about 'The Other AntiSemitism'. A Semite is not a Jew living in America
or Europe."
—Ralph Nader (Arab-American from Lebannon), ex-Green Party presidential candidate, Arab-American Business conference, C-SPAN, 2003
"'Enterprise' means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any
unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL,
as well as other, entities."
—Racketeer and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), TN CODE 39-12-203 (state RICO Act) and US CODE TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 96, Sec. 1961 (federal RICO Act)
"The investigation of strip club owner Michael Galardi and numerous politicians appears to be the first time federal authorities have used the 'Patriot' Act in a public
corruption probe. Government officials said Tuesday they knew of no other instances in which federal agents investigating allegations such as racketeering and bribery of
politicians have employed the act. Two of Nevada's lawmakers blasted the FBI for employing the act in the Galardi probe, saying the agency overstepped its bounds. 'The
law was intended for activities related to terrorism and not to naked women,' said Reid, who as minority whip is the second most powerful Democrat in the Senate. Mark
Corallo, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said, 'When the Judiciary Committee sat down, both Republicans and Democrats, they obviously discussed the
applications, that certain provisions could be used in regular criminal investigations.' That list includes Galardi, owner of Jaguars and Cheetah's topless clubs; former
Clark County Commissioner Lance Malone; former Commissioner Erin Kenny; County Commission Chairwoman Mary Kincaid-Chauncey; former County Commission
Chairman Dario Herrera; and former Las Vegas City Councilman Michael McDonald, defeated for re-election in June."
–Las Vegas Review-Journal, "P.A.T.R.I.O.T. ACT: Law's use causing concerns", November 05, 2003
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2003/Nov-05-Wed-2003/news/22521283.html
"Do not call conspiracy everything that these people call conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. The LORD Almighty is the one you are to regard as holy,
he is the one you are to fear, he is the one you are to dread, and he will be a sanctuary; but for both houses of Israel he will be a stone that causes men to stumble and a
rock that makes them fall. And for the people of Jerusalem he will be a trap and a snare. Many of them will stumble; they will fall and be broken, they will be snared and
captured."
—Isaiah 8:12-15, Holy Christian Bible (© NIV 666)
http://av1611.org/niv.html
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/kjv.browse.html
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
—President-Elect George "Texascutioner" Bush, CNN News, Aired December 18, 2000
"A president of the United States has just assumed what amounts to dictatorial power."
—William Safire, Republican, New York Times, "Seizing dictatorial power", November 15, 2001
"Dictators ride to and fro upon tigers which they dare not dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry."
—British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill during World War 2
americanautobahn.com
add your comments
Operation NORTHWOODS Treason
by John Lee • Thursday November 06, 2003 at 07:26 PM
knoxpulse@yahoo.com Knoxville TN
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Friendly Fire
Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba
By David Ruppe
N E W Y O R K, May 1 — In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to
create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas,
hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel
Castro.
America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and,
"casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
Details of the plans are described in Body of Secrets (Doubleday), a new book by investigative reporter James Bamford about the history of America's largest spy agency,
the National Security Agency. However, the plans were not connected to the agency, he notes.
The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But
they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.
"These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so
embarrassing," Bamford told ABCNEWS.com.
"The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a
war that they want but that nobody else wants."
Gunning for War
The documents show "the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government," writes Bamford.
The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba,
the documents show.
Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba [sic]."
The plans were motivated by an intense desire among senior military leaders to depose Castro, who seized power in 1959 to become the first communist leader in the
Western Hemisphere — only 90 miles from U.S. shores.
The earlier CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba by Cuban exiles had been a disastrous failure, in which the military was not allowed to provide firepower.The military
leaders now wanted a shot at it.
"The whole thing was so bizarre," says Bamford, noting public and international support would be needed for an invasion, but apparently neither the American public, nor
the Cuban public, wanted to see U.S. troops deployed to drive out Castro.
Reflecting this, the U.S. plan called for establishing prolonged military — not democratic — control over the island nation after the invasion.
"That's what we're supposed to be freeing them from," Bamford says. "The only way we would have succeeded is by doing exactly what the Russians were doing all over
the world, by imposing a government by tyranny, basically what we were accusing Castro himself of doing."
'Over the Edge'
The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on
March 13, 1962, recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military.
Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no
possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job.
The secret plans came at a time when there was distrust in the military leadership about their civilian leadership, with leaders in the Kennedy administration viewed as too
liberal, insufficiently experienced and soft on communism. At the same time, however, there real were concerns in American society about their military overstepping its
bounds.
There were reports U.S. military leaders had encouraged their subordinates to vote conservative during the election.
And at least two popular books were published focusing on a right-wing military leadership pushing the limits against government policy of the day. The Senate Foreign
Relations Committee published its own report on right-wing extremism in the military, warning a "considerable danger" in the "education and propaganda activities of
military personnel" had been uncovered. The committee even called for an examination of any ties between Lemnitzer and right-wing groups. But Congress didn't get wind
of Northwoods, says Bamford.
"Although no one in Congress could have known at the time," he writes, "Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs had quietly slipped over the edge."
Even after Lemnitzer was gone, he writes, the Joint Chiefs continued to plan "pretext" operations at least through 1963.
One idea was to create a war between Cuba and another Latin American country so that the United States could intervene. Another was to pay someone in the Castro
government to attack U.S. forces at the Guantanamo naval base — an act, which Bamford notes, would have amounted to treason. And another was to fly low level U-2
flights over Cuba, with the intention of having one shot down as a pretext for a war.
"There really was a worry at the time about the military going off crazy and they did, but they never succeeded, but it wasn't for lack of trying," he says.
After 40 Years
Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the
assassination of President Kennedy.
As public interest in the assassination swelled after JFK's release, Congress passed a law designed to increase the public's access to government records related to the
assassination.
The author says a friend on the board tipped him off to the documents.
Afraid of a congressional investigation, Lemnitzer had ordered all Joint Chiefs documents related to the Bay of Pigs destroyed, says Bamford. But somehow, these
remained.
"The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford.
http://bodyofsecrets.com
--------------------------------------------------
History Undercover: Cover Up: Attack on the USS Liberty
50 Minute video
HistoryChannel.com
Item Number: AAE-43132 (ask your library to order it)
On June 8, 1967, during the Six Day War, the intelligence ship USS Liberty was attacked off the Sinai Peninsula. The unprovoked assault came first from jets, then torpedo
boats, all of which were unmarked. Virtually unique among such cases, the incident has never been formally investigated by Congress. HISTORY UNDERCOVER® goes
where the government won't with this unblinking look at the event that strained US-Israeli relations. We'll hear from survivors of the attack about what it was like onboard the
Liberty, and the disbelief the crew felt when they realized that their anonymous assailants were their alleged allies. We'll look for signs of a cover-up in a thorough analysis
of the public statements made by both the US and Israeli governments. And we'll examine the leading theories put forth to explain the motive behind the attack, and the
reasons why the United States chose not to pursue the incident, despite the loss of 34 lives. This is the definitive examination of the Israeli sneak attack on the USS Liberty.
Interview with James Banford, author of Body of Secrets - the Secret History of NSA, who broke the bombshell news of the Pentagon's declassified Operation
NORTHWOODS terror plot against USA (but NORTHWOODS was censored from History Channel, as was the Pentagon Joint Chiefs' control of the Israeli attack on USS
Liberty).
-----------------------------------------------------------
"A group of military and civilian US pilots, under the chairmanship of Colonel Donn de Grand, after deliberating non-stop for 72 hours, has concluded that the flight crews of
the four passenger airliners, involved in the September 11th tragedy, had no control over their aircraft. The report seriously questions whether or not the suspect hijackers,
supposedly trained on Cessna light aircraft, could have located a target dead-on 200 miles from take off point. Colonel de Grand said that it would be impossible for
novices to have taken control of the four aircraft and orchestrated such a terrible act requiring military precision of the highest order. A member of the inquiry team, a US Air
Force officer who flew over 100 sorties during the Vietnam war, told the press conference: 'Those birds (commercial airliners) either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat,
or they were being manoeuvred by remote control.' In evidence given to the enquiry, Captain Kent Hill (retd.) of the US Air Force, and friend of Chic Burlingame, the pilot of
the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, stated that the US had on several occasions flown an unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, across the Pacific from
Edwards Air Force base in California to South Australia [USAF Global Hawk]. According to Hill it had flown on a pre programmed flight path under the control of a pilot in an
outside station. Bob Ayling, former British Airways boss, in an interview given to the London Economist on September 20th, 2001, admitted that it was now possible to
control an aircraft in flight from either the ground or in the air. A further question raised by the inquiry was why none of the pilots concerned had alerted ground control. It
stated that all pilots are trained to punch a four-digit code into the flight control's transponder to warn ground control crews of a hijacking - but this did not happen. During
the press conference Captain Hill maintained that the four airliners must have been choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS). This system can
engage several aircraft simultaneously by knocking out their on-board flight controls."
–THE NEWS, FrontPage Online, "September 11 - US Government accused," 03/08/2002
http://the-news.net/cgi-bin/story.pl?title=September%2011%20-%20US%20Government%20accused&edition=663
-------------------------------------------
http://texemarrs.com/reins_of_power.htm
Neocons and Dual-Loyalist Jews in Washington DC now hold the Reins of Power
Power of Prophesy radio news
by Pastor Texe Marrs, PhD, USAF (retired)
President George W. Bush is merely the puppet and "go-for boy" of powerful, behind-the-scenes, Marxist, neo-con, dual loyalist Jews. That's the conclusion of people in the
know in Washington, D.C.
Bush's total cave-in to these alien, Jewish foreign policy thugs is also well-known in Europe and the Middle East, where top newspapers and magazines regularly talk
about this and frequently name and unmask the very Jews who lurk behind the closed doors of the Bush White House.
Courage and Bravado Needed
In America, only a few alternative news sources have possessed the courage and bravado necessary to expose the Jewish neocons and dual loyalists who minutely
control this nation's foreign policy and tell President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and National Security Advisor Condi Rice what to do. These few brave sources
are taking incredible heat for their efforts. It's a dangerous and fearful thing to go up against the awesome power of the influential—and vicious—Jewish neocon
substructure that secretly rules America. Marxist, Trotskyites, and other Jewish Neocons
In a recent Power of Prophecy radio broadcast, I revealed the whole sordid mess about the neocon plotters who run the Bush Administration. Almost all these men were
once Marxists and Trotskyites, the hardest of hard-core Communists and Red sympathizers. They're predominantly anti-Christian, pro-abortion, ultra-liberal, pro-gay,
die-hard fanatical supporters of Israel. In fact, many are dual citizens. That is, they are formally citizens of two countries—Israel and the U.S.A.—at the same time. But their
chief allegiance, really their only allegiance, is to Israel and to global Jewish objectives.
Seizing an opportunity to grab the reins of power of the Republican Party (they already had a firm grip on the Democrat Party), these Jesus-haters and front men for Jewish
Zionism moved in and began to take charge during the Reagan era. They also worked covertly with Bill Clinton and his cronies to promote their "Israel First" doctrine. But
their greed and lust for power has mushroomed considerably since the election of George W. Bush.
George W. Bush, Their Faithful Servant
The younger Bush began his loyal service to these Zionist secret agents while still Governor of Texas. In Austin, he was given the "Jewish catechism and road map" by
none other than Abe Foxman, chief of the hate-filled spy agency, Jewish ADL. Then, Bush went over to Jerusalem where genocide mass murderer, Ariel Sharon, now Prime
Minister of Israel, gave him a personal indoctrination into what would be required of him as U.S.A. President.
The first step and requirement of the Zionist neocons for George W. was that he renounce his publicly stated belief that Jesus was the only path to salvation. This he did,
and his renunciation was duly recorded on the front page of the Austin American-Statesman, Austin, Texas' widely read newspaper.
The Prince of Darkness and Other Neocons Pulling Bush's Strings
The top ranks of the neocon Jewish fanatics who now run the most minute details of Bush's foreign and domestic policies include such devilish political agents as Richard
Pearle, appointed as head of the Defense Policy Board. Washington, DC insiders privately and revealingly call Pearle the "Prince of Darkness!" It was Pearle who
masterminded the Iraqi war, a war that was decided on before George W. Bush took the oath of office as President. Pearle is an associate of Henry Kissinger, a Jewish
neocon tied to Rockefeller interests.
Another Jewish neocon czar-type is Paul Wolfowitz, who monitors the work of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Michael Chertoff tells his lackey, John Ashcroft, what to
do in the Justice Department. George Tenet (real name: Cohen) heads the CIA and takes orders from the Israeli Mossad. There is also Elliot Abrams, running the show in
the stead of Secretary of State Colin Powell; others include Donald Kagan, Douglas Feith, Don Zakheim, Richard Haas, Kenneth Adelman, Steve Goldsmith, Edward
Luttwak, Robert Satloff, David Frum, Marc Grossman and David Wurmser.
All these men are Jews. All are Zionist warmongers who adore and obey Israel and who view America chiefly as Israel's financial sugardaddy and mercenary slave. Their
aim is global power for the Jews and profits for Jewish bankers and Illuminati-directed oil barons. They seem to have no problem if stacks of bloody young American
fighting men mount up in Iraq, Iran, and Syria. The dead, after all, are valueless. They are considered by the neocons as inferior gentile goyim (cattle). As such, they are
thought to be only fodder and excrement for the great Zionist New World Order dead ahead on the horizon.
Their Loyalty is to the Six-Pointed Star
The loyalty of the Bush neocon dual loyalists is not to the stars and stripes but to the six-pointed star, better known as Solomon's Seal, the witches hexagram, Rothschild's
choice of occultic symbol for the Israeli flag. To Jewish neocons, the founding fathers of America, men like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John
Adams, and Patrick Henry, are just "more dead Gentiles."
While most neocons have lived in America their entire life, their sin-scarred soul has long ago taken up permanent residence in socialist/Marxist Israel. Like so many Jews,
they hold no fondness for their country of birth, the U.S.A. Their real political forefather is Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion. Ben-Gurion, an avid admirer and
follower of Red Soviet Bolshevik butcher Lenin, insisted that Jews should never give first allegiance to their nation of birth.
"Which are you first," Ben-Gurion, Communist co-founder of modern-day Israel, once wryly asked an audience, "a Jew or an American?" His own answer shot back
immediately: "You are first and foremost a Jew."
The inside story of Zionism's historical takeover of the American government is detailed in Texe Marrs' revealing new video, Illuminati Mystery Babylon.
http://www.texemarrs.com/cgi-bin/miva?Merchant/merchant.mv+Screen=PROD&Store_Code=catalog&Product_Code=illuminati_mystery_babylon&Category_Code=Videos
-------------------------------------
"I can't imagine what went through their minds when they were plotting this horrible evil. You know, they must have thought America was so materialistic, so self-centered,
so self-absorbed, so weak, that all we were going to do was file a lawsuit."
—Resident George Bush Jr, C-SPAN, at political campaign dinner that raised a world-record $30-Million in multinational corporate bribes, May 2002, ChronWatch, "When
Class Action Is Not a Class Act," September 20, 2002 (Bushes' oilslick trial lawyer James Baker is defending the Saudis for their role in the 9-11-2001 terror massacre.
Baker is general counsel for Carlyle Group, the Pentagon broker cowned by the Bush and Bin Laden families, that recently bought Universal Studios. Baker may be
defending Bushes in the Stanley Hilton class action suing Bushes for perping the 9-11-2001 terror massacres. Bush Jr is a 5-time convicted felon guilty of desertion during
time of war, a felony punishable by DEATH!)
http://jdlee.com/links.html
http://www.chronwatch.com/featured/contentDisplay.asp?aid=378
http://www.examiner.com/news/default.jsp?story=n.lawyer.0611w
http://geocities.com/green_party_dwi_jokes
http://geocities.com/prohibition_us/dui.html
"Fuck the Jews–they didn't vote for us anyway."
–James Baker, attorney at law, general counsel for Bush and Bin Ladens at Carlyle Group, defense counsel for Saudis and Iraqis sued for 911, US Secretary of State for
President George Bush Sr and President George
Bush Jr, corporate trial lawyer for Big Oil and psycho-billionaire Howard Hughes
Knoxville, Tennessee, USA—On September 11, 2001, approximately 11:00 am EST, Knox County Emergency 911 Dispatch broadcast a "Bolo" ("terrorist" warning)
All-Points-Bulletin (APB) to apprehend Israeli—not Arab—suspects driving a large van enroute to South America. Police dispatcher advised the suspects were "armed and
extremely dangerous" and to "ensure probable cause" (for a valid traffic stop to ensure successful prosecution and conviction). Dispatcher says the APB originated from FBI
in Colorado. WTC was built by Jew David Rockefeller, and leased by Jew Silverburg.
-------------------------------------
Fox News Channel
December 12, 2001
http://infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Israeli_prior_knowledge.htm
Suspected Israeli Spies Held by U.S.
WASHINGTON — Some 60 Israelis, who federal investigators have said are part of a long-running effort to spy on American government officials, are among the hundreds
of foreigners detained since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Fox News has learned.
The Israelis, a handful of whom are described as active Israeli military or intelligence operatives, have been detained on immigration charges or under the new Patriot
Anti-Terrorism Law. Federal investigators said some of them failed polygraph questions inquiring about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.
There is no indication the Israelis were involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, but investigators suspect that they may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and
not shared it.
A highly placed investigator told Fox News there are "tie-ins," but when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified,
I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information," the source said.
An Israeli Embassy spokesman offered categorical denials, and said any suggestion of Israelis spying on or in the United States is simply not true.
But Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis spotted in North Carolina recently is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who
the U.S. authorities are investigating for links to terrorism.
Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to Sept. 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and
sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States.
Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that has been compiling evidence in the case since the mid-1990s. These documents
detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say quote "may well be an organized intelligence-gathering activity."
Investigators are focusing part of their efforts on Israelis who said they are art students from the University of Jerusalem or Bezalel Academy and repeatedly made contact
with U.S. government personnel by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.
Documents say they "targeted" and penetrated military bases, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, dozens of government facilities
and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel.
Another part of the investigation has resulted in the detention and arrest of dozens of Israelis working at kiosks in American malls, where they had been selling toys called
"Puzzlecar" and "Zoomcopter."
Investigators suspected a front. Shortly after the New York Times and Washington Post reported the detentions of Israelis on immigration charges last month, the carts
began vanishing.
Why would Israelis spy in and on the United States?
A General Accounting Office investigation referred to Israel as Country A and said, "According to a U.S. intelligence agency, the government of country A conducts the most
aggressive espionage operation against the U.S. of any U.S. ally."
A Defense Intelligence report said Israel has a "voracious appetite for information."
"The Israelis are motivated by strong survival instincts which dictate every facet of their political and economic policies," the DIA report said. "It aggressively collects military
and industrial technology and the U.S. is a high priority target.
"Israel possesses the resources and technical capability to achieve its collection objectives," the document concludes.
---------------------------------
"This week, the New York Times reported that President George W. Bush has waived a 25-year-old executive order banning assassinations. In the war against terrorism,
conventional bombing and ground assaults in Afghanistan, U.S. officials have warned, won't be enough to rout a shadowy enemy scattered in dozens of countries,
including in North America. They have hinted at a revival of dirty deeds of the past - assassinations, coups d'etat and other covert actions. They are also turning to
bounty-hunters with offers of $175 million in rewards for information about 22 terrorist suspects implicated in the Sept. 11 attacks. And where do you draw the line between
combat and assassination, especially when the enemy isn't a uniformed soldier and could be hiding in a European or Canadian city? How much evidence will be required
before a suspect can be whacked? But to many military experts, the Israeli model is actually proof that a campaign of assassinations is the wrong solution. 'The Israelis
have been assassinating people for years and it doesn't seem to have worked as a deterrent. It generally inflames groups,' said Joel Sokolsky, dean of arts at Canada's
Royal Military College. An undercover team from Israel's Mossad intelligence agency mistakenly shot a Moroccan waiter in Lillehammer, Norway, in front of his pregnant
wife as they came home from the movies. Local police caught the team and a public trial exposed the operation. Making matters worse, documents found by the
Norwegians were passed to French authorities who discovered a network of Israeli safe houses in Paris and more evidence of the assassination program. Five members
of the hit squad were sentenced to jail in Norway. Pike said assassinations send a dubious message: 'Assassination is not normally considered a state policy of
democracies. It's normally considered a policy of terrorist states and dictatorships.' The CIA had also been rocked by disclosures about its Phoenix Program during the
Vietnam War in which bounty hunters murdered an estimated 20,000 suspected communists. The ban didn't mean an end to CIA dirty tricks. Some experts say it just drove
them underground. The CIA was again rocked by scandal in the 1980s and 1990s over arms sales to Iran, illegal support for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels and ties to drug
traffickers and members of death-squads."
–GlobalSecurity.org, The Gazette (Montreal), "When the state turns assassin," October 20, 2001
"It seems to me like Justice was stood on its head. In Boston, we had a group of FBI agents who decided to throw the rules out the window. They let a lying witness send
innocent men to death row and life in prison. They had a group of mob informants committing murders with impunity. They tipped of killers so they could flee before being
arrested. They interfered with local investigations of drug dealing and arms smuggling. We had a bunch of criminals running around killing people under virtual FBI
protection."
—Chairman Dan Burton, Committee on Government Reform, US Congress, February 14, 2002
http://www.house.gov/reform/beth/investigation_fbi_doj_misconduct/feb_14_hearing/opening_statement0214.htm
"The only way to treat terrorists is for what they are – international killers. And the only way to find them is to be patient, and steadfast, and hunt them down. And the United
States of America is doing just that."
—President George Bush Jr., 2003
"Please, don't kill me!"
–Governor George "Texascutioner" Bush Jr, Larry King Live, CNN, 1999
"And they had as king over them the angel of the Abyss, whose name in Hebrew was Abaddon, and in Greek, Apollyon. (Abaddon and Apollyon mean Destroyer.)"
—Revelation 9:11, Holy Christian Bible (©NIV 666)
(Why did NASA NAZI Luciferian Freemasons name their Apollo "Moon landing" program for SATAN?
"All propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt its spiritual level to the perception of the least
intelligent of those towards whom it intends to direct itself. The great masses of the people will more
easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one."
—Nazi Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler Shicklegruber Rothschild, illegitimate heir to half the world's wealth with NM Rothschild bankster dynasty
americanautobahn.com
add your comments